I've been spending a lot of time this month sorting through photographs, documents, pages of words, many in longhand. And
I think what it most reminds me of is river or lake swimming, where the
destination floats, raft-like, somewhere ahead of you. If you’re extremely
nearsighted, as I am, you can’t really see anything more than a blob. It takes
some kind of faith to keep moving forward.
But
it has me thinking about the liquidity of memory, and the estuary-like
conditions where fact meets fiction in a brackish exchange.
How
factual is our personal truth? Does it matter? How accurate is our memory?
“Everything
is still in there, every experience,” I used to think, just like last week’s
carton of eggs is in the refrigerator, waiting.
Or
maybe like my computer’s memory, with files waiting to be opened.
But
whole memories aren’t stored that way, at all. They’re stored as fragments to
be reassembled by the process of remembering, and not all at once, but
sequentially.
Hence
the sensation of fluidity. And also, the brackishness, as fiction infiltrates
the facts you remember.
There’s
far too much feeling wrapped up in memory for anything resembling factual
accuracy.
The
purpose of seining through past documentation has been to recover my early days
with LH (in the Proustian sense) and place them in a timeline. How quickly did
we move from being complete strangers to the full-body immersion of lifelong
commitment?
Naturally,
I am trying to write about it. What else would I do?
Fortunately,
he was writing all this time. He’d been writing the column for thirty years
before I wrote the letter that caused us to meet.
(I think that’s how he met the woman who
became his second ex-wife, as well. Makes sense. His life and work floated on a
constant flow of letters, back then.)
Between
us in those early months, we produced a thick file of letters. I have been able
to cross reference those letters with his columns and with his calendars, at
least for the year we met. (Several years of calendars are missing.)
Splash!
We’re paddling around in that brackish reality where truth is surely all around
us, but certainty is hard to grasp.
The
calendars note the daily column subjects, in black, and any notable place he’s
going, in red. Stories related to his travels often appear four or five days
later. Details for the red notations are minimal. But they give me the dates
for the experiences I’ve remembered, some of which are mentioned in the
letters. And the experiences, themselves, are described in the columns, while I
watch from the wings, there but unseen, unknown to the reader.
As
a result, I am coming to admire the achievement of good biography even more
than I did before. Finding the living person, or people, among the artifacts of
a relationship requires much imagination. Far more than memory, alone, can
provide.
I
was a very literal person when I was young. I wanted logic and fact, and became
annoyed when I was required in school or out of school to assess varieties of
meaning in between the facts. The very attempt destabilized me. I floundered.
Experience
and time have allowed me, now, to see what lies between and around (the dark
matter of our lives, in a way) and I am comfortable within that space.
It
is where truth resides.
And
though nothing I discover will allow the full recovery of the past (even Proust
could not attain that), still—as I paddle—I am discovering a more complete
truth than any we experienced as individuals.
No comments:
Post a Comment